The title of this article shouldn’t come as a surprise, we know that the mainstream media is trash and that they paint pictures with blurry brush strokes. Most of the people who work at places like CNN, MSNBC, or the like are lying sacks of horse manure.
So, I really shouldn’t be surprised that people who only watch mainstream media are confused about the incidents concerning Kyle Rittenhouse and his defense of life.
After talking to a few people about this, I can say that most of them have no clue what the facts behind the case actually are. Then, once they learn the actual facts their minds change about his verdict.
The Jury was presented with facts on the case, and the Jury decided his fate. In this very high profile case, the Jury decided properly.
One of the lies spread by the media and even high level politicians, is that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist. After saying he was a white supremacist, the media never once informed their audience that the ONLY people he shot were white.
One person we spoke to thought that the people he shot were of a different color than he is. Of course we know this isn’t true, and the only reason why she believed that was because it is what she was told. Jump Kick Man was NOT white, but he didn’t even come into play and was not injured by Rittenhouse.
Then again, it would NOT have mattered what the color of his skin was because he kicked Rittenhouse. And because a kick to certain parts of the body can be considered deadly use of force (because more people are killed with hands and feet each year than with AR-15s), it can be met with similar or greater use of deadly force out of defense of life.
The above mentioned person also thought that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with the rifle he used. We know that was false because it belonged to someone else, but the media never reported that.
They also made it seem like it was illegal for him to be there. Not only is it not illegal for him to be there, this is the United States of America. I don’t need permission to drive to Wisconsin. I just get in my car and go. But, I don’t know anyone in Wisconsin so I just keep my butt here at home.
The interesting thing about this, is that Rittenhouse DOES know people.
Like his dad, who lives in Kenosha — which is another severely underreported fact about the case.
Did this lady we spoke to know any of that stuff? Nope. Because her CNN and MSNBC decided that those facts weren’t pertinent to their political agenda that all guns are bad and all gun owners are white supremacists.
LOL.
Finally, the person also said that she didn’t think Rittenhouse should be able to claim self-defense in his shooting, because they thought he went on a shooting spree, or was an active shooter. Gee, I wonder where they got that one from?
Oh, maybe it was the prosecutor when he lied to the jury about that very topic. Then the media, instead of doing any actual journalism, ran with the lies and reported it to the People.
That lady now knows that Rittenhouse only shot people who directly threatened his life. He had multiple chances to shoot other people but did NOT do so.
Why? Because they were of no threat to him and he was acting in self-defense.
She is also now privy to the rest of the facts surrounding his self-defense, as well, because I refuse to have ill-informed people in my presence. What other facts? Well, how about the fact that all the people he shot were convicted felons?
One of them was a pedophile with actual convictions and on the offender list.
Oh, and I just want to say because it pisses me off: If you’re okay with pedophilia like many of the media outlets seem to be, and Hollywood elitists like Mark Ruffalo giving them pet names like “JoJo” you can go screw yourself because you’re also a piece of trash.
The bigger media outlets are no friend of the American People. They haven’t been for a while, and the sooner we can all realize that the better off we’ll all be.
If there was one good thing that came from this trial, it’s that people are waking up to the fact that the media has been lying through their teeth for a political agenda.
